Search


Advanced Search
Nenad Bach - Editor in Chief

Sponsored Ads
 »  Home  »  Croatian spirituality  »  To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
 »  Home  »  Croatian Heroes  »  To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
 »  Home  »  Human Rights  »  To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
 »  Home  »  Croatians in B&H  »  To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
 »  Home  »  Education  »  To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
 »  Home  »  Bilingual  »  To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
To the Security Council of The United Nations regarding the Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina
By Darko Žubrinić | Published  06/26/2012 | Croatian spirituality , Croatian Heroes , Human Rights , Croatians in B&H , Education , Bilingual | Unrated
Low blows of Carla del Ponte and a Canadian general, part 1

 
U našem pismu povodom rasističkih Haaških presuda od 15. travnja 2011. napisali smo vam kako “znamo da je za vas braniti svoj Dom, svoj Narod i svoju Državu samo PLANIRANI UROTNIČKI ZLOČIN!“ To se odnosi i na Hrvate u BiH, a i njima se sudi i sudilo se u vašemu Den Haagu  na isti sramotni način.

Ovih dana smo svjedoci kako se i Vatikan pribojava da bi katolici u Bosni i Hercegovini za koje desetljeće mogli posve nestati. Od oko 800.000 katolika u 1991. godini danas ih je ostalo 440.000. Eliminiranje Hrvata iz BiH, što vojnim što nevojnim sredstvima, zapravo je eklatantan primjer genocida.

Za čiji račun želite očistiti BiH od Hrvata? U što namjeravate pretvoriti tu državu?

Hrvatski narod se ponosi i uvijek će se ponositi onima kojima vaš „Sud“ određuje drakonske kazne pa čak i zbog spašavanja stotinjak tisuća ljudi – samo zato što su muslimani. Jedan od onih koji ce zauvijek biti među ponajboljim  sinovima hrvatskog naroda, haaški optuženik, ovako govori o ratu između žrtava velikosrpske agresije, muslimana i Hrvata BiH:


 
In our letter, following The Hague’s racist judgement brought down on 15 April 2011, we stated that “we know that for you defending of our Homeland, our People and our Nation is just a PLANNED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY!”. This also applies to the Croatians from Bosnia-Herzegovina, who have been, and are being, judged in your Hague in the same, shameful manner.

Recently we have seen the Vatican express its concerns about the Catholic population of Bosnia-Herzegovina which may disappear in the upcoming decades. Of the 800,000 Catholics in 1991, today only 440,000 remain in Bosnia-Herzegovina. The elimination of Croatians from Bosnia-Herzegovina, through military and non-military means, is for all intents and purposes a blatant example of genocide.

For whose benefit do you intend to cleanse Bosnia-Herzegovina of its Croatian people? What do you intend to convert this State into?

The Croatian people are proud, and will always be proud, of those to whom your “Court” has handed down draconian sentences, even those responsible for the saviour of one hundred thousand or so civilians in Bihać – only because they were Muslims. One of those accused, awaiting sentencing in The Hague, who will forever remain one of the finest sons of the Croatian people, thus describes the war between the victims of Greater Serbian aggression, the Muslims and Croatians of Bosnia-Herzegovina:




Historic speech of Slobodan Praljak

 
Završni govor generala Slobodana Praljka
Haag, 21. veljače 2012.

I.

Obuka policajaca iz BIH u Hrvatskoj, a koje šalje SDA još 1991. god.

Obuka pilota A BIH u Republici Hrvatskoj.

Obuka i opremanje čitavih postrojba A BIH u Hrvatskoj.

Zbrinjavanje stotina tisuća muslimanskih izbjeglica u RH.

Organiziranje eksteritorijalnog školstva za muslimane izbjeglice u RH i to na, tada još nepostojećem, bosanskom jeziku.

Vremenski neprekinuto naoružavanje A BIH.

Municija, nafta, lijekovi, hrana i ostala potrebna logistika A BIH za vođenje rata.

Liječenje više od 10 000 ranjenih boraca A BIH u hrvatskim bolnicama.

Omogućavanje dolaska više tisuća mudžahedina u A BIH.

Regularni logistički centri A BIH u Zagrebu, Rijeci, Splitu, Samoboru, tijekom cijelog rata.

Itd., itd.

I sve to besplatno.

Nikada u povijesti ratovanja jedan narod – (Hrvati) – nije tako i toliko pomogao drugi narod – (Bošnjaci-Muslimani) – i onda kada su potonji okrenuli svoju vojsku – (A BIH) – protiv Hrvata – (HVO) – u BIH.

Nikada u povijesti ratovanja zapovjednik jedne vojske (HVO-a) nije propuštao konvoje oružja (i ostalog) drugoj vojsci (A BIH) i onda kada je ta vojska ( A BIH) to oružje (i ostalo) koristila za napade na one koji su joj to propustili.

a) A što je s referendumom Hrvata za BIH, koji je preduvjet za postojanje te države.

b) Priznanje BIH od RH.

c) Imenovanje veleposlanika RH u BIH.

d)  Potpisivanje svih prijedloga međunarodne zajednice o unutarnjem uređenju BIH a prvi koji su potpisivali bili su predstavnici HZ HB i RH.

To je bila politika dr. Franje Tuđmana, predsjednika RH, to je bila politika Vlade RH i Sabora RH i MORH-a, to je bila politika HVO-a.

To su za tužiteljstvo ovog suda elementi UZP-a.

Takva optužnica služi se logikom koja je uvredljiva i za kognitivni sustav patogenog virusa.

I-1.

Kakvo mišljenje i koji stavovi prethode ovakvoj optužnici?

1. Simon Leach, bivsi kvartovski policajac u Velikoj Britaniji, član tužiteljskog tima koji je istraživao zločine Hrvata u Lašvanskoj dolini, na jednom sastanku u tužiteljstvu 1996. godine izvadio je papir na kojem su pisala imena: Franjo Tuđman, Gojko Šušak, Vice Vukojević. Tumačio je i objašnjavao da su to ciljevi do kojih će dovesti njegova istraga.

2. Citiram iz knjige Williama Montgomeryja „Kad ovacije utihnu“. (Struggling with democratic transition; After the cheering stops, 2010), stranica 114.

„Specijalni ambasador SAD-a za ratne zločine Pierre Prosper pozvao je trojicu američkih ambasadora iz regiona (iz Srbije, Hrvatske i Bosne) da dođu u Haag kako bi se sastali s predstavnicima MKSJ. Dvije uspomene naročito su upečatljive. Prva se odnosi na to da smo direktno od Carle del Ponte čuli da se zvaničan pristup njene kancelarije temelji na stavu da su svi ratni lideri svih strana krivi za ratne zločine, a da zatim razmatra koji su to određeni zločini i kako da dokaže njihovu krivicu. Takvo gledište tada mi se učinilo – i još mi se čini – pogrešnim po mnogim osnovama.“

Je li gospodin Montgomery vjerodostojan svjedok?

Kakva je reakcija ostale trojice?

Stavovi Carle del Ponte nisu „pogrešni po mnogim osnovama“, to je imperijalna bahatost, degradacija prava na komunističke čistke i nacističke pogrome.

3.  U svojoj knjizi La Caccia – Io E I Criminali di Guerra, u 10. poglavlju “Zagabria, dal 1999 al 2001“, na stranici 254. piše:

Jedan od tužitelja Suda, Kanađanin dobro poznat u krugu po svojoj duhovitosti i dosjetkama, služio se aforizmom kojim je dobro isticao razliku između Srba i Hrvata koji su pokušavali ometati rad Suda: “Srbi su kopilad,” govorio je, “dok su Hrvati podmukla kopilad.”

1. Taj tužitelj suda, Kanađanin, služi se govorom mržnje.

1.1. Del Ponte upotrebljava trajni glagol „služiti“ (upotrebljavati). To znači da to nije bila „dosjetka“ jednom upotrjebljena, već uobičajeni način šovinističkog i rasističkog karakteriziranja HRVATA – „podmukla kopilad“.

1.2.  Carla del Ponte prenosi riječi jednog od tužitelja suda bez ikakvih ograda, a to znači da se ona s takvim mišljenjem u cijelosti slaže. I to trajno u skladu sa značenjem glagola „služiti“ (upotrebljavati).

2.  Potpuno mi je nejasan izostanak bilo kakve reakcije na takav profašistički način govora o jednom narodu. Mene interesira da li je u ozračju takvog mišljenja napisana optužnica protiv mene.

Da sam, kojim slučajem, ja, Slobodan Praljak, napisao ili izrekao takvu kvalifikaciju bilo kada, u bilo kojoj formi prema bilo kom narodu ili skupini u vrijeme rata na prostorima bivše Jugoslavije, dobio bih samo zbog toga 5 godina zatvora. Želim saznati da li na sudu u Haagu vrijedi: „Quid licet Iovi, non licet bovi.“ Želim saznati da li međunarodne organizacije koje su osnovale sud i koje se brinu o njegovoj pravičnosti, podržavaju taj stav, izrečen u spomenutoj knjizi.


 
Closing address of General Slobodan Praljak
The Hague, 21 February 2011

I

The training of police officers Bosnia-Herzegovina in Croatia, who were sent by the Party of Democratic Action (SDA) as early as 1991.

The training of pilots of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Army (BH Army) in the Republic of Croatia.

The training and equipping of entire BH Army units in Croatia.

The taking up of hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees in Croatia

The organisation of ex-territorial education and schooling for Muslim refugees in the Republic of Croatia, in the Bosnian language, which didn't even exist at the time.

The uninterrupted supply of weapons to the BH Army.

Ammunition, oil, medication, food, and other necessary logistics for the BH Army in order to wage a war

The medical treatment of more than 10.000 wounded BH Army combatants in Croatian hospitals.

Enabling thousands of Mujahedin to come and join the BH Army.

Logistic bases for the BH Army located in the Croatian towns Zagreb, Rijeka, Split, and Samobor throughout the war. And so on and so forth.

And all of this for free!

Never in the history of war have one people, the Croats, provided so much help to another people, the Bosnian Muslims, even when the latter turned their army, the BH Army, against the Croats, the Croatian Defence Council (HVO), in Bosnia - Herzegovina.

Never in the history of war has the commander of one army, the HVO, let convoys with armaments and other equipment pass through to another army, the BH Army, even when that army, the BH Army, used those armaments and all the rest to attack those who let them receive it.

a) And what about the referendum of Croats for Bosnia-Herzegovina, which was a precondition for the existence of that state;

b) the recognition of Bosnia and Herzegovina by the Republic of Croatia;

c) the appointment of the Ambassador of the Republic Croatia to Bosnia-Herzegovina;

d) the signing of all propositions made by the international community on the internal structure of Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the first ones to sign were the representatives of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna (HZ-HB) and the Republic of Croatia.

That was the policy of Dr. Franjo Tudjman, president of the Republic of Croatia. It was the policy of the Government of the Republic of Croatia, the Parliament of the Republic of Croatia and the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia. It was the policy of the HVO.

To the Prosecution of this Tribunal, all these are elements of a joint criminal enterprise.

Such an indictment uses logic that is offensive even to the cognitive system of a pathogenic virus.

I - 1

What kind of opinion and which positions precede such an indictment?

1 - Simon Leach, a former police constable in Great Britain, a member of the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) who investigated crimes committed by Croats in the Lasva Valley, at a meeting of the Prosecution in 1996, produced a piece of paper with names of Franjo Tudjman, Gojko Susak and Vice Vukojevic. He interpreted and explained that these were the goals that his investigation was leading to.

2 - I quote from William Montgomery's book, “Struggling with democratic transition; After the cheering stops”, page 114:

"The US special ambassador for war crimes, Pierre Prosper, invited three American ambassadors from the region; from Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina to come to The Hague in order to meet with the representatives of the ICTY. Two particularly distinct observations remain. The first one refers to the fact that we heard directly from Carla Del Ponte that the official approach of her office is based on the premise that the war leaders of each of the parties are guilty of war crimes, and, thereafter she considers which specific crimes can be used to prove their guilt. At that moment, it seemed, and it still seems to me, that such a viewpoint is false for several reasons."

Is Mr. Montgomery a credible witness?

What was the reaction of the other three?

The viewpoints of Carla Del Ponte are not “false for several reasons”. Her position is that of imperial arrogance and a degradation of law and its reduction to Communist purges and Nazi pogroms.

3 - In her book "La Caccia: Io e Il Criminali Di Guerra," Carla Del Ponte says, on page 254:

One of the Prosecutors of the Tribunal, a Canadian, well known in his circle for his wit and anecdotes, had an aphorism that did a good job capturing the difference between the Serbs and the Croats who attempted to obstruct the work of the Tribunal. “The Serbs are bastards, he used to say.  In contrast, the Croats are perfidious bastards."

1 This Prosecutor of the Tribunal, the Canadian, is using the language of hate.

1.1 Carla Del Ponte uses the phrase "he used to say", which means that it was not a one-off witty remark, but a habitual, chauvinistic and racist characterisation of the Croats as “perfidious bastards”.

1.2 Carla Del Ponte relays the words of one of the Prosecutors of the Tribunal without any restrictions, which means that she completely agrees with that opinion; on an ongoing basis, too, which we can infer from the language and the phrase “he used to say”.

2 The lack of any reaction to such a pro-fascist manner of speech about one nation is something I cannot comprehend. I'm interested in knowing whether the indictment against me may have been drafted under the impression of such an opinion.

If, by any chance, I, Slobodan Praljak, had written or said anything like that, anywhere, at any time, about any people or nation or group during the war in the territories of the former Yugoslavia, for that alone I would have been sentenced to five years of imprisonment.

I really would like to know whether the saying "quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi" is something that is a valid rule here in this Tribunal. I really would like to know whether the international organisations, which established the Tribunal and which ensure that it is fair, support the viewpoint mentioned in the said book.



Please, go to the next page below



Comments


Article Options
Croatian Constellation



Popular Articles
  1. (E) 100 Years Old Hotel Therapia reopens in Crikvenica
  2. Dr. Andrija Puharich: parapsychologist, medical researcher, and inventor
  3. Europe 2007: Zagreb the Continent's new star
  4. Violi Calvert: Nenad Bach in China to be interviewed by China Radio International
  5. Potres u Zagrebu - Earthquake in Zagreb, Croatia 28 listopad 2006 u 16:15 3.7 on a Richter
No popular articles found.