
Sponsored Ads
|
» Home
» Politics » (E) neglected victim of WW II by Gunter Grass
(E) neglected victim of WW II by Gunter Grass |
By Nenad N. Bach |
Published
03/5/2002
|
Politics
|
Unrated
|
|
(E) neglected victim of WW II by Gunter Grass
By Peter Finn Washington Post Foreign Service Monday, February 11, 2002; Page A18 VIENNA -- From Vienna to Berlin, the embers of history have unexpectedly flared in politics, literature and journalism to reveal an allegedly neglected victim of World War II and its aftermath. The German. After decades of fitful introspection about the crimes of Hitler's Reich and the burdens of atonement, the German-speaking world has recently become seized with the fate of 13 million Germans who were expelled from Eastern Europe in 1945 and 1946. Tens of thousands died as they fled to Germany and Austria, rousted from their ancestral homes by the redrawing of Poland's borders and their status as defeated pariahs in what was then Czechoslovakia. An unusual constellation in the culture that combines the leftist, Nobel Prize-winning German novelist Gunter Grass with the Austrian hard-right politician Jorg Haider has resurrected German suffering as a worthy if still controversial topic. Grass, in his latest novel, "Crab Walk," has fictionalized the horrific death of 8,000 Germans fleeing Poland by ship in 1945. Haider has capitalized on recent Czech comments that ethnic Germans expelled from the Sudeten borderlands with Germany and Austria after the war were traitors deserving of their rough fate. Suddenly, the long-ago dislocated Germans are a popular sorrow. The influential Austrian tabloid, Neue Kronen-Zeitung, ran an emotional series last week under the headline "Death to the Germans," recounting in excruciating detail the deprivations suffered at the hands of Czechs. And the premier German magazine, Der Spiegel, in a cover story on Grass's novel, said the last taboo was being broken as Germans moved beyond their own atrocities to confront the cruelty of their neighbors. "Since the crimes committed by us Germans were and are so overwhelming, there was obviously no strength left to also talk about the history of our own suffering," Grass said in the weekly German newspaper Die Woche. The debate over whether this compulsory flight was righteous revenge for Hitler's willing minions or a crime upon a crime has long been consigned in Germany and Austria to the margins of political and academic consideration. The cause of the expellees, as they are known in Germany and Austria, found little or no outlet in societies busy ignoring or apologizing for the sins of their fathers. To raise it too loudly smacked of apologizing for fascism. Frank Bajohr, a historian at the Institute for Contemporary History in Hamburg, noted that the last broad political discussion of the expellees occurred in the 1950s and was marked by a self-pity that allowed Germans to avoid confronting their own crimes. The discussion died as the horrors of the Holocaust came into focus for Germans in the late 1960s. The German politician Antje Vollmer said Auschwitz left no room for the subject of German tribulations. But Austria and Germany are no longer so silent. "With this book, Gunter Grass keeps the tragedy of millions of people who suffered greatly in the expulsion from the east or who lost their lives from being forgotten," former German foreign minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher wrote in a recent newspaper column. "Gunter Grass is writing not to settle scores, but to counter forgetting about the horrors and the distress always associated with the war." On a continent where accelerating integration through the European Union is supposed to bury the bloody past, not everyone is comfortable with this subject -- not least those countries that kicked the Germans out, often at gunpoint. Poles remain leery that Germans will reclaim what they lost by using their wealth to buy up areas that were formerly part of Germany. For that reason, in negotiations to enter the European Union, the Poles have fought for a long transition period in which foreigners -- meaning Germans -- would be barred from buying agricultural land. Also, the issue of restitution remains a real fear for eastern countries, which firmly oppose it. An Austrian group of expellees is threatening to launch a class-action suit in U.S. courts to reclaim property, following the path of Jewish groups that sought recompense for the Holocaust. But it was Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman who galvanized political interest in the expellees. He said in an interview with an Austrian magazine this month that ethnic Germans were Hitler's fifth columnists, bent on the destruction of Czechoslovakia. Their forced removal, he said, was a founding moment in the denazification of the country and the establishment of Czechoslovak sovereignty. "Many Sudeten Germans committed treason, a crime which was punishable by death according to the laws of the time," Zeman said. "If they were expelled or transferred, it was more moderate than the death penalty." That set off a firestorm in Austria and Germany, where it was interpreted as assigning collective guilt to the 3 million people expelled from Czechoslovakia, many of whom were children. Haider, the power behind Austria's far-right Freedom Movement, jumped on the comments, saying the Czech Republic should not be allowed to join the European Union until it repeals the Benes decrees, approved by the Allies at the Potsdam conference in 1945, that allowed the expulsion of Germans and the seizure of their property. Expellee groups have long linked EU membership for eastern countries to redress for the past, but they have failed to move either the German or Austrian government. But this time the controversy quickly spilled beyond the far right. The leader of the German opposition, Edmund Stoiber, said the Benes decrees were an "injury to Europe [that] must be finally healed when the European Union is enlarged eastwards." German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, who pronounced the Sudeten question closed after the signing of a German-Czech reconciliation treaty in 1998, threatened to cancel a March visit to Prague. The German Parliament moved to debate the subject. Austrian President Thomas Klestil called the Czech president, Vaclav Havel, to complain. And the expellees and their descendants suddenly found themselves with an avalanche of welcome publicity. "It is almost as if people are rediscovering that something was very wrong," said Hildegund Pobel, a Berlin resident who was 14 when she and her family were stripped of their valuables and expelled from Czechoslovakia in June 1945. "It was a taboo. And in the West, hardly anyone dealt with the expulsion for the last 30 years. It was something people distanced thems elves from -- it was uncomfortable." Germans with no connection to the Sudeten Germans are also now speaking with none of the old self-censorship. "I think the issue of suffering is too one-sided," said Jenny Buehnig, 33, who works in a Berlin video store. "For years we have only been hearing about the pain and suffering of one group. But there were other groups, too, and what happened to them was not right, either. There were German expellees, and they shouldn't be forgotten. But as soon as you say that, you are considered a neo-Nazi." Such sentiments worry some observers. "The expulsion was unjust, but it is minor compared to what the Nazis did and cannot be understood in isolation but in the larger context of the time," said Gerhard Botz, a professor of history at the University of Vienna. And Josef Harna, a historian at the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague, said the Sudeten Germans were the authors of their own misery because of their overwhelming support for the Nazis. The Benes decrees, he said, were an expression of Czechoslovak liberty. And he rejects the idea that they were a criminal ethnic cleansing, noting that anti-fascist Germans were allowed to stay in their homes. It is the historians' hope that Germany's long self-examination, which began in earnest after the student revolts of 1968, may now be mature enough to allow a studied consideration of the whole period, including the trauma of German refugees. More than anyone else, it is Grass, the brilliant curmudgeon of German letters, who might allow this to happen. A native of Danzig, which is now Gdansk in Poland, Grass has used his fiction since the publication of "The Tin Drum" in 1959 to lecture his countrymen on their burdens and failings. He was unsparing in lacerating Germans and just as often resented for it, which makes his newest sympathy all the more surprising. His new novel, published last week, centers on the sinking of a German liner, the Wilhelm Gustloff, which was torpedoed by a Soviet submarine while fleeing Danzig in January 1945. More than 8,000 people perished in what is being called the German Titanic. Beyond neo-Nazi memorializations, the story was little known in Germany until Grass picked it up. Grass said he wants to reclaim that history from the fascists. The book has received sterling reviews for its prose as much as for its political ramifications. The distinguished literary critic Marcel Reich-Ranicki, a Jewish survivor of the Warsaw ghetto, said on German television that he nearly wept as he read "Crab Walk" and pronounced it among the "best, most distressing works that Grass has written." The response was just as emotional in the popular press. Writing in the German tabloid, Bild, the columnist Franz Josef Wagner, an expellee, addressed Grass and said, "My mother fled from village to village with me. For that reason I did not drown in the cold water. I survived camps, hunger and lice. You write about the German victims of Hitler. So many relatives of mine died trying to flee. Uncles, aunts, cousins, we expellees are now allowed to cry together. I thank you for this feeling." 2002 The Washington Post Company Distributed by www.CroatianWorld.net. This message is intended for Croatian Associations/Institutions and their Friends in Croatia and in the World. The opinions/articles expressed on this list do not reflect personal opinions of the moderator. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please delete or destroy all copies of this communication and please, let us know!
|   | | | |