
Sponsored Ads
|
Articles by this Author
»
(E,H) Croatia Winns over Belgium & Andorra 4:0 & 2:0
|
Croatia- Andorra 2:0 
Croatia's Dado Prsa, left, is challenged by Roberto Jonas Alonsoof Andorra during a qualification match for the 2004 European FootballChampionship, in Varazdin, Croatia on Wednesday April 2, 2003. (AP Photo/HrvojeKnez) Euro 2004: Croatia beats Andorra 2-0 in qualifier ZAGREB, Croatia - Milan Rapaic scored twice fromdead ball situations to give Croatia a 2-0 victory over tiny Andorra onWednesday in a Group 8 qualifying match for the 2004 European Championship. The 28-year-old winger, who was a constantthreat on the left flank, scored his first goal in the 11th minute after heneatly converted a penalty kick awarded after striker Tomislav Maric was trippedin the box. "We deserved to win, but we should have played better and scored up tofive goals against such a weak and indisposed team," Croatia coach OttoBaric said. Rapaic scored the second a minute before the interval with another superbfree kick from outside the penalty area that sailed over a defensive wall andinto the top corner of goalkeeper Luis Alvarez's net. The Croats dominated the match with flurries of attacks from all sides of thepitch and could have scored several more goals, while the visiting Andorranswere unable to move into a goalscoring position during the entire game andrarely passed the halfway mark of the pitch. The win lifted Croatia into second place in Group 8, overtaking key rivalsBelgium. Bulgaria leads the group with 10 points, three ahead of Croatia andfour ahead of Belgium. Lineups: Croatia: Stipe Pletikosa; Dario Simic, Boris Zivkovic, Igor Tudor, JosipSimunic (Niko Kovac 45th), Milan Rapaic (Mario Babic, 64th), Robert Kovac, JerkoLeko, Tomislav Maric (Marko Stanic, 45th), Dario Srna, Dado Prso. Andorra: Luis Alvarez, Manuel Ayala, Antoni Lima, Emiliano Gonzalez ( AlainMontwani, 90th), Genis Garcia, Oscar Sonejee, Juli Fernandez, Manuel Jimenez (JordiEscura, 54th), Juli Sanchez, Marc Pujol, Agusti Pol (Jesus Lucendo, 8th). U KVALIFIKACIJAMA ZA EP HRVATSKA SVLADALA ANDORU s 2:0 (2:0) Rapaic i Estonija za aplauz I drugu pobjedu na putu prema Portugalu potpisao je Milan Rapaic prekrasnim pogotkom iz slobodnog udraca i sigurnim izvodenjem jedanaesterca VARAzDIN - Nakon nezaboravne predstave protiv Belgije, Milan Rapaic je blistao i u Varazdinu, te potpisao i drugu pobjedu u pet dana. Hrvatska je nadjacala Andoru s 2:0 i zauzima drugo mjesto u 8. kvalifikacijskoj skupini za Europsko prvenstvo 2004. godine. A prije jos samo sest dana nasa je reprezentacija bila izgubljena. HRVATsKA - ANDORA 2:0 VARAzDIN - Gradski stadion. Gledatelja 8.500. Vrijeme oblacno, vjetrovito. sudac salomir (Rumunjska) 6. strijelci: 1:0 - Rapaic (10 - 11m), 2:0 - Rapaic (44) HRVATsKA: Pletikosa 6.5 - R. Kovac 6.5, Simic 6.5, Simunic 6 (od 46. N. Kovac 6) - Srna 7, Leko 6.5, Tudor 6.5, zivkovic 6.5, Rapaic 7.5 (od 65. Babic 6) - T. Maric 6 (od 46. stanic 6.5), Prso 7. Izbornik Otto Baric. ANDORA: Alvarez 7 - Ayala 5, sonejee 5.5, Fernandez 6, Alonso 5, J. Garcia 5- Gonzalez 5.5 (od 90. Mottovani -), Pujol 5.5 - Pol 5.5 (od 79. Lucendo -), Gimenez 5 (od 55. Escura 5) - J. sanchez 6. Izbornik David Rodrigo.
Varazdinci su napunili svoju "bombonijeru", zahvalili "kockastima" na velikoj pobjedi nad belgijskim Crvenim vragovima i prizeljkivali da se mreza Andore do vrha napuni. I tih je osam tisuca gledatelja sinoc najvise pljeskalo Milanu Rapaicu i Estoniji. Njemu za prekarsan pogodak iz slobodnog udarca, za sigurnost pri izvodenju jedanaesterca i za nekoliko minijatura. Estonicama pak stoga jer su otrgnuli favoriziranoj Bugarskoj dva velika boda i borbu u nasoj kvalifikacijskoj skupinu uciniliuzbudljivom. David Rodrigo, izbornik gostiju, postavio je ispred svog vratara Jesusa Alvareza barikade. Prestrasen cetvorkom "kockastih" protiv Belgije, on se potpuno zatvorio, s nakanom da primi sto manje pogodaka. Otto Baric je znao da ce se Andora zacahuriti, no ostao je pri svom planu, zaigravsi s tri stopera i zivkovicem ispred njih. I spocetka nismo uspijevali probijati bokove, pa smo pokusavali dalekometnim topnistvom naceti goste. Tek se Dado Prso nudio, trazio je s kim ce odigrati dupli pas, ponovno se dopao, namjestio veliku prigodu Tomislavu Maricu, no malo je bilo raspolozenih. I onda je jedna visoko nabacena lopta Darija simica pala u sesnaesterac, Alonso je zakacio Maricevu nogu na kojoj je stajao. Ostalo je s bijele tocke obavio Rapaic. I dalje smo se mucili, bilo je poluprigoda, a onda je pri samom kraju prvog poluvremena Rapaic iz slobodnog udarca na semaforu ispisao 2:0. Kasnije se ispostavilo - i konacni rezultat. Tudoru drugi zuti karton VARAZDIN - Igor Tudor kaznjen je zutim kartonom, a kako mu je to drugi u ovim kvalifikacijama, ne smije nastupiti na gostovanju protiv Estonije 11. lipnja. - Upozorili smo Tudora da se cuva zutog kartona, no nije bio oprezan. steta - komentirao je Otto Baric, ocito vec razmisljajuci o sljedecem susretu. zal zbog Tudorova kartona djelomicno je nadoknadilo zadovoljstvo zbog remija Bugara. (zv) U nastavku smo vrlo rano imali tri prigode, no uspjeli smo samo razbuditi vratara Alvareza, koji je sjajno reagirao. Taj pocetni zalet je polako nestajao, sve smo vise grijesili, akcije su bile sve sporije i na kraju varazdinsku cemo utakmicu pamtiti po velika tri boda. Do puta u Tallin ostalo je nesto vise od dva mjeseca, a za izbornika Barica ostala je briga kako pronaci igraca koji ce malo bolje povezati redove, preko kojeg ce ici igra. Priznat ce i izbornik da takvog jos nemamo, no obecao je da ce ga pronaci, i to medu nogometasima koji su bili u kadru na posljednje dvije utakmice. IGOR FLAK Euro 2004: Croatia beats Belgium 4-0 ZAGREB, Croatia - Croatia kept its hopes alivefor a berth in the 2004 European Championship by trouncing Belgium 4-0 in aGroup 8 qualifying match Saturday. Youngster Dario Srna put the Croats ahead in theninth minute with a misdirected cross on the right side that wrong footedgoalkeeper Franky Vandendriessche and flew into the right side of the net. Genk striker Wesley Sonck then had a chance to level the score, but failed tobeat Stipe Pletikosa from close range. Monaco striker Dado Prso, who was making his debut for the Croats, made it2-0 eight minutes after half-time when he headed in a cross from winger MilanRapaic. Forward Tomislav Maric made it 3-0 in the 68th minute with another headerfrom the small box, while midfielder Jerko Leko finished the scoring eightminutes later when he weaved his way through the Belgian defense with amesmerizing run and fired the ball home. "It was painful," said midfielder Thomas Buffel. "When theyscored the second goal, we knew we were in trouble." The win vaulted the Croats, who were floundering in second-to-last place withonly one point from two matches, back into the running for a berth in theEuropean Championship, to be played in Portugal. The Belgians remain in secondwith six points from four matches, behind runaway leaders Bulgaria, who areundefeated in three matches, on nine points. Lineups: Croatia: Stipe Pletikosa; Dario Simic, Boris Zivkovic, Igor Tudor (Niko Kovac78th), Josip Simunic, Milan Rapaic, Robert Kovac, Giovanni Rosso (Jerko Leko46th), Tomislav Maric, Dario Srna, Dado Prso (Mario Stanic 68th). Belgium: Franky Vandendriessche, Joos Valgaeren (Jelle Van Damme 66th), TimmySimons, Olivier De Cock (Eric Deflandre 56th), Daniel Van Buyten, Peter Van derHeyden, Gaetan Englebert (Walter Baseggio 54th), Bart Goor, Emile Mpenza, ThomasBuffel, Wesley Sonck.
|
»
(E) Remembering the Croatian Miracle on Ice
|
Remembering the CroatianMiracle on Ice 
Mark Pavelich When the US Olympic hockey team won the gold medal at the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, NY., the victory for the Americans would eventually be labeled as the "Miracle on ice" as a bunch of unknown collegians defeated the heavily favored Russians. The win also changed the face of professional hockey by introducing the game to an even wider American audience and introduced us to a then unknown young hockey player from Minnesota whose grit and determination would later take him to very solid NHL career.
It was February 1980, the winter Olympics were starting in Lake Placid, my morning ritual consisted of reading the Chicago Sun-Times before I boarded the "L" at Harlem station on my way to school on Michigan Avenue in downtown Chicago. There were 2-3 pages dedicated to the Olympics and the names of some of the Olympians representing the USA. One of those last names has a long-standing tradition in the NHL that dates back to the 1950's.
Mark Thomas Pavelich was born February 28th 1958 in Eveleth Minnesota. He is the son of Croatian pre World War II immigrants that arrived in the USA from the "Lika" region of Croatia and settled in rural Minnesota in an area known as the "Iron Range". Growing up in Eveleth, like a typical "Lican" Mark liked the outdoors and would go fishing and hunting often. His other passion was playing hockey and watching his hero's Guy Lafleur and Bobby Orr on the "tube" as they worked their magic during Hockey Night in Canada broadcasts on the CBC.
"Prvo skola a onda profesionalni hokej." After progressing through the Eveleth minor hockey system Mark Pavelich enrolled at the University of Minnesota at Duluth. In his first season with the Bulldogs Pavelich scored 12 goals and added 7 assists for a total of 19 points. His second season in the NCAA with the Bulldogs was even better as he scored 14 goals and assisted on 30 for 44 points in 36 games played. The 1978/79 season at the University of Minnesota was a breakthrough year for Mark Pavelich as he scored 31 goals and assisted on 48 others for a total of 79 points in 36 games, which at the time became the new school record. He finished 3rd in the league (WCHA) scoring race, was given NCAA West First All-American Team honors and named to the WCHA First All-Star Team as the Bulldogs finished the season in 3rd place in the WCHA Upper Division. After 3 progressive years with the Bulldogs Pavelich was starting to impress a lot of people, and there was one more year left of collage eligibility.
|
»
(E) BH Croats out numbered and on the defensive.
|
The Muslim-Croat Civil War in Bosnia: A Military History, 1992-1994 I know some of you know about this book, but its already available for pre-order on amazon, although the blurb I could find only on the UK site. I daresay it will cause a stir!
"In a conclusion which some may find uncomfortable, Shrader argues that far from being the attackers, the Bosnian Croats in Central Bosnia were clearly out numbered, outgunned and on the defensive. "
The Muslim-Croat Civil War in Bosnia: A Military History, 1992-1994 (Eastern European Studies) Charles R. Shrader Our Price: Ł32.95
Reviews
Synopsis In this volume, Charles R. Shrader offers a military history of a crucial conflict in Bosnia between two former allies. When the Bosnian Serbs and their Serbian allies attacked Bosnia-Herzegovina in March 1992 the Bosnian Croats and Muslims collaborated to defend themselves. As Serbian pressure increased and it became clear that the West would not intervene, the two allies began to stake out their own claims. Drawing from cases presented before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Shrader describes the organization and tactical doctrine of the Croatian Defence Forces and the Muslim-led Army of Bosnia-Herzegovina. He analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the two sides in such fields as communications, training and logistics. In a conclusion which some may find uncomfortable, Shrader argues that far from being the attackers, the Bosnian Croats in Central Bosnia were clearly out numbered, outgunned and on the defensive.
Brian Gallagher brigall@yahoo.co.uk
|
»
(E) ER - Tonight Dr.Luka Kovac and Croatian Child
|

Tonight (4/3/03) on ER (NBC) Dr. Kovac tries to bring an ill Croatian boy to the US
|
»
(E) European film festival @ Columbia Univ. TODAY
|
FILM LINEUP OF THE 2003 ASN WORLD CONVENTION
***For the complete preliminary program, registration form and general information on the convention, please consult our web site at www.nationalities.org*** The ASN World Convention, the world's largest scholarly gathering on identities and nation-building in East Central Europe, the Balkans, former Soviet Union, and Eurasia, will be screening recent documentaries and feature films, in addition to its large selection of panels. The Convention runs 3-5 April 2003 at Columbia University, sponsored by the Harriman Institute. Each screening will be followed by discussion.
The 2003 selection of documentaries includes the internationally-acclaimed CHILDREN UNDERGROUND (US, 2000), on runaway children in Romania, winner of the Sundance Film Festival Grand Jury Prize in 2001; RETURNING HOME; REVIVAL OF A BOSNIAN VILLAGE (Bosnia Herzegovina, 2001), by Norwegian anthropologist Tone Bringe, and Peter Loizos, on the return of Croat refugees to a previously mixed village, the sequel of Bringe's 1993 documentary We Are All Neighbours; GREETINGS FROM GROZNY (UK, 2002), following a detachment of special Russian forces and a unit of rebel Wahabite fighters; THE DAMNED AND THE SACRED (Netherlands, 2002), on the contrast between a Chechen traditional youth dance group touring Europe and the reality back home, from Dutch director Jos dePutter, whose previous film The Making of a New Empire screened at ASN 2000; KILLING THE STORY (UK, 2002), a BBC investigation on the murder of a leading journal, the tape scandal, and allegations of sanctions breaking in Ukraine; SOLDAT (UK 2001), a riveting portrayal of conscripts in the Russian army; HOPING FOR PEACE (Georgia/Abkhazia region, 2002), a joint report from journalists in Georgia and Abkhazia on the Gali region in Abkhazia, mostly populated by ethnic Georgians, and running along the ceasefire line; and SHTO NOVOVO, AN ELEGY FOR THE UNION (US 2003), on industrial depression, corruption, and Russian outmigration in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan (the screening will be preceded by the short WOMEN, WATER AND SOCIAL CHANGES: LESSONS FROM CENTRAL ASIA). The convention will also screen the feature films THE WAR (VOINA)(Russia, 2002), a brazen fictional account of a rescuing operation in Chechnya, the latest Russian film of young actor Sergei Bodrov Jr.; and FORTRESS EUROPE (Slovenia, 2000), on immigrants from the East trying to smuggle their way to "Europe". A few more films will be added to the lineup before the convention.
Dominique Arel (darel@brown.edu) Film/Video Section Chair CHILDREN UNDERGROUND US 2000 (1h45 mins.) Directed by Edet Belzberg Contact: <belfilms@aol.com> In Romanian with English subtitles Venturing below the streets of Bucharest, Romania to the infamous Piata Victoriei subway station, filmmaker Edet Belzberg introduces us to five members of a "family" of orphaned, abandoned, and runaway children living there. The children beg and steal to buy food and Aurolac, which they sniff to get high. In this striking cinema verite documentary, Belzberg reflects on the difficult problem of youth homelessness at the beginning of a new millennium, where children with highly developed skills of survival are addicted to life on the street. Winner of the 2001 Sundance Special Jury Prize for Documentary.
RETURNING HOME: REVIVAL OF A BOSNIAN VILLAGE Bosnia and Herzegovina 2001 (48 mins.) Directed by Tone Bringa and Peter Loizos Contact: <Tone.Bringa@cmi.no> In Croatian and Bosniak with English subtitles
Filmed between 1999 and 2001, "Returning Home" documents the return of the internally displaced Muslims or Bosniaks to their homes seven years after being expelled from an ethnically mixed (Bosniak/Croat) village in central Bosnia. "Returning Home" is a sequel to "We are all Neighbours" produced in 1993 by Granada Television in co-operation with Tone Bringa. The earlier film chronicles the gradual breakdown in personal relationship between Muslims and Croats as war approaches the village of "Dolina". Following some of the same families featured in the 1993 film, this film highlights the decisive role of the international community in facilitating returns to this village by guaranteeing the returnees' security and providing economic means for house reconstruction. Above all, however, it talks to steely determination of the displaced villagers to rebuild their pre-war lives, and their surprisingly sympathetic attitude toward Croat refugees living in their homes.
GREETINGS FROM GROZNY UK 2003 (52 mins.) Directed by Paul Mitchell and Tatiana Rakhmanova Contact: Andy Halper <Halper@thirteen.org> In Russian and Chechen with English subtitles
For three weeks in May 2002, Paul Mitchell filmed in and around Chechnya. He followed a detachment of special Russian forces and a unit of rebel Wahabite fighters. The director and his crew, who also lived with Chechen refugees in Grozny and the surrounding villages, give us a moving glimpse of the life of civilians ruined by the war. They take us to the valley of Pankisi on the border between Chechnya and Georgia, a zone that, according to Russian and American secret services, could well serve as a new based for radical Islamists linked to Al Quaeda. The documentary posits the viewpoints of Russian forces about "cleansing operations"-described as simple identity checks- against those of the civilian Chechen population, often the main victims of these raids. Operations that, according the human rights groups, constantly violate the most basic rights.
THE DAMNED AND THE SACRED (DANS, GROZNY DANS) The Netherlands 2002 (76 mins.), English subtitles Directed by Jos de Putter Contact: Frank van den Engel <zeppers@xs4all.nl> In Dutch, Russian and Chechen with English subtitles After The Making of a New Empire, which screened at ASN 2000, director Jos de Putter again focuses his attention on Chechnya, with an attractive portrait of a traditional youth dance group. They go on a tour of Europe; the contrast between the destroyed buildings in the Chechen capital Grozny and the concert halls of Europe is gigantic. The dancing teacher impresses on the youngsters that they have to show the Europeans that Chechens are normal people, not terrorists, and that therefore they have to do their utmost. De Putter continuously switches between here and there; the two worlds are bridged by endless bus trips and melancholic music. The alternation makes clear that these children carry their ravaged country with them everywhere they go. KILLING THE STORY UK 2002 (55 mins.) Produced by Ewa Ewart (BBC, UK) Contact: <eva.ewart@bbc.co.uk> What links the murder of a leading journalist, the President of the Ukraine, a shy young bodyguard and allegations of international arms smuggling and sanctions breaking? In a documentary prepared for the BBC investigative series Correspondent, reporter Tom Mangold unravels the threads that hold together an extraordinary mystery story involving conspiracies at the highest level, secret tape recordings, beatings by government goon squads and a moving target, running for his life with a six million dollar price on his head. SOLDAT UK 2001 (77 mins.). Directed by Paul Jenkins Contact: Daniel Wolf <daniel@firstcirclefilms.co.uk> In Russian with English subtitles The Russian Army, up close and personal, the first time a foreign television production has been allowed extensive and long-term access. The film follows conscripts drafted as a cheap alternative to the professional army Russia can no longer afford. For two years, recruits are sucked into a highly ritualized and hierarchical system of barrack room hazing, brutality and humiliation called dedovshchina ("the rule of the grandfathers"). They emerge fundamentally changed. Junior and senior officers are seen struggling against seemingly endless woe in an army starved of basic resources. Though most maintain a grim humour, the results are shocking and sad. HOPING FOR PEACE Georgia/Abkhazia region 2002 (35 mins.) Directed and produced by Svetlana Korsaia (Abkhaz State Television), Mamuka Kuparadze (Studio Re), Mikheil Mirziashvili (Studio Re), in collaboration with the London-based NGO Conciliation Resources. Contact: Rachel Clogg <rclogg@c-r.org> A unique collaboration between Abkhaz and Georgian journalists. Made in 2002 this is the first joint documentary film in the decade since a ceasefire brought to an end the Georgian-Abkhaz war of 1992-93. Exploring the lives of people in the Gal/i region on the front line between the conflicting parties, this thirty minute film grapples with key challenges in the faltering peace process. Working together on all aspects of the production the four journalists together visited Gal/i, Sukhum/i and Tbilisi.
SHTO NOBOVO, AN ELEGY FOR THE UNION US 2003 (52 mins.) Directed by George FitzHerbert (Harvard U, US) <fitzherb@fas.harvard.edu> In Russian, Kyrgyz and Uzbek with English subtitles
An evocative portrait of transition in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. While illustrating the traditional pastoral life of the Kyrgyz, the film addresses issues of industrial depression, corruption, and the outmigration of the Russian population since the Soviet collapse, and gives voice to the nostalgia with which many remember the Soviet era.
preceded by WOMEN, WATER AND SOCIAL CHANGE: LESSONS FROM CENTRAL ASIA US 2003 (20 mins.) Directed by Billur Gungoren (Columbia U, US) <bggr@elcat.kg> An exploration of gender differences in the water sector drawing lessons from a community water management project implemented in six villages in Central Asia between 1998 and 2001. Common myths on women's roles and abilities in water management, specific aspects of gender inequalities during the transformation period, and an innovative social change process are described.
THE WAR (VOINA) Russia 2002 (1h55 mins.) Directed by Alexei Balabanov Contact: <intercin@edunet.ru> In Russian Overshadowed by events in the Middle East and Afghanistan, the war in Chechnya goes on and on, the Chechens taking hostages and detonating bombs in southern Russia and the Russian army repressing the rebellion with scorched earth brutality. In Alexei Balabanov's controversial slice-of-war, two Russian soldiers and two touring British actors are taken captive by the Chechen rebels. John, one of the two young Britons, is sent home to fetch 4 million pounds as ransom for his fiancée. Back in England, the authorities don't want to hear anything about it, but the actor finally manages to find the required sum and he and a fellow ex-hostage Vanya revisit Chechnya in a blaze of disorganized, vicious revenge. Twenty-year old lead actor Aleksei Chadov was voted Best Actor at the 2002 Montreal World Film Festival. FORTRESS EUROPA (TRNDJAVA EVROPA) Slovenia 2000 (80 mins.). Directed by Zelimir Zilnik Contact: Alenka Sfiligoj <toni.trsar@siol.net> In several languages, English subtitles.
Artyom and his daughter Katya try to smuggle their way into Italy to join Artyom's wife Sveta, who had emigrated to Italy a long time before and found a job with the last remaining coachman of Trieste. Artyom, Katya and a group of other refugees are however arrested, first by the Slovenian and then by the Italian police. The refugees are confronted with all kinds of procedures at police headquarters and then moved to a centre for illegal immigrants, awaiting deportation, the heavily guarded "Fortress Europe." Zelimir Zilnik became internationally known in the Sixties for his visually expressive and critical films.
|
»
(E) FREE gas masks for US residents
|
Free Gas Masks to US residents www.Freegasmasks.com
New Jersey company offered 100,000 surplus adult and children's gas masks for cost of shipping and handling. Masks are free to US residents - shipping and handling is $9.85 each mask.
I called them today, March 26, 2003 and they still have 20,000 available.
Katarina Tepesh
|
»
(E) Fishing in Croatia
|
Fishing in Croatia Check out the last paragraph in this story concerning the potential for excellent fishing in Croatia. This appeared in the March 23, 2003 New York Times. John Kraljic
March 23, 2003 Seeking God's Fish, a k a Tigris Trout By JAMES PROSEK
he little-known trout of the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers in eastern Turkey present a fascinating evolutionary puzzle for trout biologists. Both of these rivers flow to the Persian Gulf, where trout were never native. It is generally accepted that trout evolved from ocean-going relatives, so if they did not get to the headwaters from the sea then where did they come from? Toward the end of the last ice age, about 13,000 years ago, when the glaciers were melting and retreating north, a lot of excess water was flowing off inland areas and the trout had routes available to them that no longer exist. It is thought, therefore, that trout invaded the Tigris and Euphrates basins from headwater streams of the Mediterranean, Caspian and Black Seas during postglacial times (or as a result of other natural phenomena that created a connection between river drainages). Hence, these fish should be some kind of genetic hybrid of the three oceans or isolated populations of each. No one had really studied them, so nobody knew.
The only published information on the Tigris trout was in a paper written in 1954 by the Italian biologist Enrico Tortonese of Torino University, entitled, "The Trouts of Asiatic Turkey." The single female specimen he observed was from a stream he called Sitak, in southeast Anatolia, which is most likely a village and river called Çatak. My friend Johannes Schöffmann, a baker from southern Austria and a fanatical trout fisherman, thought it might be interesting to go there and find them. So we organized an expedition to southeast Turkey six years ago. The word for trout in Turkish is alabalik, incorporating the prefix, ala, which can mean either a scarlet shade of red, or speckled, and balik, which means fish. I wanted to think that alabalik meant God's fish, combining Allah, or God, with balik, fish. It made sense to call this trout God's fish because it was one of the few, if not the only, native fish in Eden. The historic location of the garden was said by some to be the headwaters of the Tigris River. John Milton wrote in "Paradise Lost" that the Tigris bubbled forth near the Tree of Life itself. The trout and all fish were favored by God; after all, he chose a calamitous fate for man, the flood, that would leave the fishes temporarily displaced but ultimately unharmed. In the summer of 1997, Johannes and I traveled overland from his home in southern Austria to eastern Turkey. Our goal was to look for native trout in the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. After catching some native trout in northern Greece and in the coastal streams of the Black Sea in Turkey, we made our way to the Euphrates basin and its small tributaries northwest of Mount Ararat. Finding trout to be more or less abundant there, we headed south toward the Iraqi border and the headwaters of the Tigris. Because so little information existed on the trout of the Tigris, we were especially curious to see how distinct they were from other brown trout. These were, after all, the native trout of Eden. But the garden was not so easy to enter again. Southeast Turkey had been occupied for many years by the Turkish military in an effort to keep the Kurds from separating and establishing their own nation, Kurdistan. For this reason we — an Austrian and an American in a Land Rover — had trouble gaining access. The members of the military warned us of Kurdish guerrillas in the hills. They told us we could be kidnapped and taken hostage, but we were persistent. Army personnel searched our vehicle to see if we were a threat, but at last we appeased them with cartons of cigarettes. They laughed and started to believe that we actually wanted to catch alabalik. A van of police officers escorted us to a stream near the town of Çatak, about 25 miles from the Iraqi border. We were allowed three hours to fish in a swift and freezing cold river and caught nothing. It did not look promising. Hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles lined the road as the army prepared for a military operation in Çatak that evening. We abandoned our mission and headed west again toward the Mediterranean coast. Johannes was disappointed by our first effort but not deterred. He returned to southeast Turkey with his wife, Ida, in September 2002, when he convinced the military to let him go where he wanted, paid Kurdish militia members to guide him to the streams and caught six specimens. The red and black spots on the native Tigris trout were jagged and irregular like cracked peppercorns, and they had unusually large and rounded fins. Johannes believed that the large fins were an adaptation to living in such fast rivers. Now the trout in this region face a new threat: war. How the trout will fare only time will tell. In desperate times local people use explosives, bleach, nets and all manner of scurvy techniques to snare the fish for food. In other cases, however, the trout are the beneficiaries of war. Johannes and I saw this in Croatia last summer, where stream banks like those of the Zrmanja River were mined so heavily that native people are afraid to go there. The trout in such Balkan streams have been left untouched for more than 12 years. Their populations are among the most healthy of any trout stream I have seen; a fantastic fishing opportunity for any anglers willing to risk their lives to catch a beautiful native fish.
|
»
(H) FILIPOVIC NOKAUTIRAO SAPPA
|

FILIPOVIC NOKAUTIRAO SAPPA
HNA HR-K1-FILIPOVIC-Sport
SAITAMA, 30. ožujka (Hina) - Hrvatski borac Mirko Filipovic nokautirao je u 1. rundi americkog gorostasa Boba Sappa na K1 turniru u japanskoj Saitami. Popularni "Cro Cop" srusio je nakon samo minutu borbe 170 kilograma teskog i dva metra visokog protivnika kombinacijom udarca lijevom nogom u jetru i snaznim lijevim direktom izravno u Sappovo oko. Bivši igrac americkog nogometa, kojeg zovu "Zvijer", ostao je lezati na podu, a da prakticki nije dotaknuo hrvatskog borca. Filipovic je ovu pobjedu, koja ce mu jako podici ugled medu K1 borcima, posvetio sinu Ivanu.
|
»
(H,E) Bog, Rat, Amerika i Hrvatska - on TV
Bog, Rat, Amerika i Hrvatska" Iz Americke Krscanske Perspektive Alpha & Omega Production Company presents TV documentary series premiere: Our Nation At War - Voices of America (Non Biblical and Biblical Views of Wars) Produced & directed by Croatian from Evanston, Zvonimir B. Ranogajec (Branko Rano) March 29, 2003 at 2:00 p.m. on Evanston TV Channel 6.
Iz Americke Krscanske Perspektive BOG, RAT, AMERIKA i HRVATSKA Pise: Zvonimir B. Ranogajec Krscanski TV producent Nekoliko pitanja svim prosvjednicima skupova i onima koji su se izjasnili ili se izjasnjavaju protiv rata, bez obzira dali su vjernici ili ne: odobrava li Bog rat? Postoji li Biblijski razlog odlaska u rat? Koje su posljedice ici u rat, a koje su posljedice ako se ne ide u rat? Je li zlocin ubiti neprijatelja u ratu? Meni kao krscaninu najmjerodavnije je sto Sveto pismo kaze u svezi s ratom, a ne misljenja pojedinih ljudi, koji potpuno iskljucuju Boga iz toga, kao da Bog ne postoji i nije uopce vazno sto Bog misli i govori o tome!? Kada nacija ide u rat Bozji ljudi moraju pravilno razumjeti sto Bog misli i kaze o ratu. Krscani moraju objasniti s mnogo ljubavi, razumijevanja i pomoci Duha Svetoga, i drugim ljudima bez obzira da li su vjernci ili ne, sto Bog misli i govori o ratu! Da cujemo sto apostol Pavao kaze u Svetom pismu o nasem odnosu prema drzavnoj vlasti, u odnosu vlasti prema nama, kolika je njihova moc nad nama i kako se mi trebamo vladati.Poslanica Rimljanima, glava 13, redak 1-4. "Neka se svatko pokorava visim vlastima, jer nema vlasti osim od Boga. I one koje postoje, od Boga su spostavljene. Zato onaj koji se suprostavlja vlasti protivi se odredbi Bozjoj. A koji joj se protive, navuci ce sami se osudu. Poglavara se ne treba bojati kad se radi dobro, vec kad se radi zlo. Hoces li da se ne moras bojati vlasti, cini dobro te ces s njezine strane imati hvalu! Jer ona sluzi Bogu za tvoje dobro. Ali cinis li zlo, boj se, jer ne nosi uzalud maca. Ona naime sluzi Bogu da kazni onoga koji cini zlo". Apostol Pavao nam ovdje jasno kaze da moramo postivati zakone vlasti. Drugo, drzavna vlast je postavljena od Boga. Kakav bi to svijet bio bez drzavnih vlasti. Postavljanjem vlade, koja se sastoji od pojedinaca, muskaraca i zena, Bog od njih ocekuje da razumiju Bozje zakone i da ih provede za dobrobit gradana. Od vlastodrzaca se ocekuje da budu na strani pravde i da se bore protiv nepravde, zla u drzavi. Vlastodrsci se moraju boriti protiv zla koji zeli je napasti. Zasto ratovi Kada razmisljamo o ovim stvarima, tu su neka pitanja, koja traze odgovor. Upitajmo se prvo, zasto uopce narodi ratuju? U nekim slucajevima, kao na primjer u slucaju agresije na Hrvatsku gdje su Srbi zauzeli dio hrvatskog tla. Ekonomija je razlog ratu u nekim slucajevima, a ponekad mrznja prema drugom narodu ili dijelu toga naroda. Ponekad, kao u slucaju diktatora Adofa Hitlera, zelja za dominacijom nad cijelim svijetom.Vjera je takoder bila razlog mnogim ratovima.Ponekad se ide u rat da se oslobode oni kojima je oduzeta sloboda, a ponekad, kao u slucaju nase domovine Hrvatske, i domovinskog rata, kada je nacija morala ici u rat da obrani svoju domovinu od neprijatelja. Ponekad se ide u rat da se pomogne i zastite druge nacije od napada i okupacije drugih zlih diktatora. Ima mnogo razlicitih razloga zasto ljudi i narodi ratuju! Pitanje koje si moramo postaviti je slijedece; kako Bog gleda na rat medu ljudima? Naravno, Bog nije udusevljen ratom i svim onim uzasnim stvarima sto rat donosi, jednako kao sto ni mi nismo. Ali, mi moramo razumijeti da Bog ima poslas nama grijesnim i nesavrsenim bicima, o kojima u Svetom pismu ovako govori:"Podmuklije od svega je srce, jedva popravljivo, tko da ga pronikne?" (Jeremija 17,9) Ako zelimo vidjeti kako Bog vidi covjecanstvo, bez njega, zapravo kako covjek izgleda i kako se ponasa kada Boga iskljuci iz svoga zivota, pogledajmo Poslanicu Rimljanima 3, 10-18. "Kao sto stoji pisano: "nema pravedna ni samo jednoga". Nema razumna, nema nikoga koji trazi Boga. Svi su zastranili, zajedno se pokvarili. Nema ni jednoga jedinoga koji cini dobro. Njihovo je grlo otvoren grob, jezicima svojim varaju, zmijski je otrov za njihovim usnama. Usta su im puna kleveta i gorcine. Noge su im brze na prolijevanje krvi. Rusevine s bijedom na njihovim su putovima. Put mira nisu priznali. Nema straha Bozjega pred njihovim ocima". Jasno je dakle vidljivo da su mnogi ljudi na nasoj zemaljskoj kugli protiv njega, bore se protiv njega i onih koji ga slijede. Kada Bog dotakne temu rata, On vidi rat na veoma specifican nacin. Iako Bog mrzi rat, On ponekad upotrebljava rat da postigne svoju namjeru i cilj! Postoji vrijeme koje je Bog izabrao, i kada ce izabrati rat kao nacin da ispuni svoju bozansku volju! Sjetimo se sto Bog kaze u Propovjedniku 3 "Sve ima svoje doba, i svaki posao pod nebom svoje vrijeme", a u Propovjedniku 8 gdje kaze da postoji "Vrijeme rata i mira". Nakon ovih rijeci Propovjednika mozemo se upitati; da li je Bog naklonjen ratu? Okrenimo stranicu Svetog pisma na Ponovljeni zakon 20,1-18 i na stranicu Jeremija 5,15-17. Iz ovih biblijskih zapisa proizlazi da je Bog naklonjen ratu i zasto. Ne samo da je naklonjen ratu, Bog u ovom zapisu objasnjava na veoma razumljiv nacin i u detalje kako ratovati pod njegovom palicom da bi se ispunila njegova bozanska volja u tome ratu. Veoma je vazno zapamtiti sto pise u Ponovljenom zakonu 20,10 "Kada dodes pod koji grad da na nj navalis, najprije mu ponudi mir", dok Ponovljen zakon 20,12 kaze: "Ali ako odbije tvoj mir i zarati s tobom, opsjedni ga". Bog jasno kaze da se neprijatelju se mora dati prilika da se preda, da podigne bijelu zastavu u znak predaje. Ako to ne ucini, "opsjedni ga"! Ovdje kao Hrvat s americkim drzavljanstvom i iskrenim postovanjem i ljubavlju prema drzavi u kojoj zivim i radim vise od tridest godina zelim iznjeti slijedece: Amerika je cesto u svojoj povijesti bila u poziciji kada je neumorno trazila od neprijatelja de se preda i polozi oruzje. Amerika je sudjelovala u mnogim ratovima i uvijek je bila vise nego fer prema svojim neprijateljima. Meni nije poznata ni jedna nacija na svijetu koja je dobila rat, i odmah po zavrsetku rata potrosila miljune i miljune dolara poreza svojih gradana, kako bi pomogla podici iz pepela i izgraditi tu zemlju! (slucaj Njemacke). Potpuno se slazem s kanadskim novinarom Gordonom Sinclairom koji je svojevremeno kazao da su Amerikanci najnesebicniji i vjerojatno najmanje postovani narod na cijelome svijetu! Ja sam zahvalan dragom Bogu, gospodinu Isusu Kristu da zivim u Americi! Kaznjavanje zlih Po ovome sto smo dosad vidjeli, Bog je definitivno naklonjen vodenju ratova. Ponovljeni zakon 20, 1-18 to slikovito dokazuje. Ne samo da objasnjava u detalje kako i zasto ratovati, Bog takoder upotrebljava rat kao osudu prema svojim ljudima, za jednu vrstu osude prema onima koji cine zlo. Bog takoder upotrebljava rat kao osudu prema svojim ljudima, koji su se okrenuli nevjerstvu i nemoralu, kao sto je slucaj s izraelskom nacijom, i to nekoliko puta. U Jeremiji 5,15-17, Bog kaze da ce upotrijebiti rat, ne samo da kazni zle, nego ce disciplinirati i poduciti svoju djecu razumijevanju sto je rat, i sto neposlusnost, nevjerstvo i nemoralnost donose! Sveto pismo nas uci da postoji vrijeme kada nije mudro ni pametno ulaziti rat, ali isto tako Sveto pismo nas uci i upozorava da postoji vrijeme kada cemo platiti ogomnu cijenu ako ne udemo u rat! Primjer Izraelaca kada su odbili Bozju zapovijed da se bore za svoju obecanu zemlju, protiv neprijatelja koji je mrzio Boga, sluzi nam kao pouka, koju ne smijemo nikada zaboraviti. Za svoju neposlusnost i protivljenju Bozjoj zapovijedi da udu u rat, Izraelci su platili stavicno veliku cijenu. Sveto pismo ovako opisuje ovu tesku Bozju kaznu; (Brojevi, 32,13) "Jahve je gnjevom planuo na Izraelce pa ih je pustinjom povlacio cetrdeset godina, sve dok ne pomrije sav narastaj sto je u ocima Jahvinim zlo postupio!" Ako netko misli da nije dobro i pametno uopce ratovati, neka upamti sto se dogodilo Izraelcima. Proveli su punih cetrdest godina u divljini, gdje su bili izlozeni raznim bolestima i ostalim nedacama. Izgubili su jednu cijelu generaciju, jer nisu htjelu slusati Boga kada im je zapovjedio da idu u rat! Dakle, postoji vrijeme kada je daleko bolje ici u rat, jer u protivnom treba platiti golemu cijenu! U Svetom pismu, narocito u Starom zavjetu, gdje Bog uzdize i uzvisuje pojedince i stavlja ih na celne pozicije da ratuju u ratovima koje On odobrava. Na primjer Gideon, koji se borio za svoju Izraelsku naciju u ratu protiv neprijatelja. David, koji je bio general, ujedno i Kralj. Bog je izabrao i postavio te ljude na celne pozicije. Dakle, Bog definitivno nije protiv rata! No, netko ce sigurno reci da je Bog protiv bilo kakvog rata! To nigdje u Svetom pismu ne pise! Vjerojatno ce se spomenjati Novi zavjet, no o tome malo kasnije. Jedno je sigurno, Bog odobrava rat i to iz specificnog razloga, da bi kaznio zle izvrsio svoju volju. Mnogima se ne ce vjerojatno svidjeti ove rijeci, ali Bog ima svoje bozanske razloge. Zasto je Amerika na udaru Bog ima bozanskih razloga za sve sto radi! Zahvaljuci mome dolasku u ovu krscanku zemlju, Bozjom miloscu sam nanovo roden, spasen! Krscani u Americi razumiju Bozju istinu. Zasto? Generacijama i generacijama, stoljecima i stoljecima Bog je sacuvao "dobru vijest" od onih koji su htjeli svim silama zabraniti Bozju rijec u Americi. Danas u Americi postoje mnogi ljudi i nacije koji bi htjeli pod svaku cijenu unistiti Krscansku vjeru i nametnuti svoju! No Bog to ne ce dopustiti, jer On voli svoje ljude i nacije. Bog ne voli samo Ameriku, Bog voli ljude svugdje, gdje god oni bili ili zivjeli. Sotona koji postoji, kao sto i Bog postoji, uvjerio je mnoge ljude da on ne postoji, i to je njegova najveca laz! Sotona neopisivo mrzi Ameriku, jer je Amerika danas tvrdava istine poslanja Isusa Krista! Po prvi puta u povijesti covjecanstva i ove zemlje, Amerika ima na raspolaganju najmoderniju tehnologiju na polju informacija i komunikacja da obuhvati cijeli svijet dobrom vijescu Isusa Krista! Osim toga, danasnji predsjednik Amerike George W. Bush je nanovo roden krscanin (u Svetom pismu pise da svatko tko Isusa Krista prihvati za svog osobnog Spasitelja, duhovno je nanovo rode i njegov zivot poprima novu dimenziju). No,vratimo se natrag pitanju odobrava li Bog rat? Netko ce sigurno reci da ne odobrava, jer ici u rat znaci ubijati. No, kad vojnik ubije neprijatelja u ratu to nije zlocin, jer vojnik izvrsava naredenja svoje drzave za koju se bori. On poslusno slusa i izvrsava svoj zadatak, koji mu je dodijeljen u ratu. To nije zlocin! Zlocin je kada nekoga ubijes iz mrznje, osvete, nesnosljivosti, kada covjek zeli unistiti drugog covjeka! Ima li pojedinaca u ratu koji namjerno ubijaju? Sigurno da ima! Ali ici u rat i boriti se casno za svoju domovinu, ne znaci da je covjek ratni zlocinac! Uzmimo slucaj naseg Domovinskog rata. Jesu li su nasi ratnici, dobrovoljci i generali bili ubojice ili ratni zlocinci? Svakako da nisu! Borili su se za svoju drzavu. "Neka se svatko pokorava visim vlastima, jer nema vlasti osim od Boga. I one koje postoje, od Boga su postavljene. Zato onaj koji se suprostavlja vlasti protivi se odredbi Bozjoj"(Rimljanima 13,1-2) Nasi ratnici ubijali su neprijatelja jer su morali, a ne sto su ga osobno mrzili! Borili su se za svoju domovinu. Razmislimo malo o danasnjoj situaciji u kojoj Hrvati optuzuju svoje branitelje, dobrovoljce i generale i nazivaju ih ubojicama i ratnim zlocincima i drugim imenima, samo zato jer su se borili za svoju domovinu. Razlozi za rat Sveto pismo navodi i razloge za rat, a jedan od njih je obrana nacije. Bog kaze da je svaka drzavna vlast odgovorna za pripreme u obrani od neprijatelja.Bozja namjera je da svaka drzavna vlast je odgovorna za pripreme u obrani od neprijatelja. Svi ratovi se ne vode na isti nacin i sva ratista nisu uvijek negdje drugdje. Ovaj puta ratiste je ovdje gdje ja zivim. Amerika je u ratu vec od 11. rujna 2001. godine! Ljudi se ovdje pitaju kako reagirati na sve to? Mozda ce im pomoci Isusove rijeci (Evandelje po Luki 22, 35-36): "Zatim im rece" Kad vas poslah bez kese, bez torbe i obuce, je li vam sto nedostajalo?" Nista" odgovorise mu. Ali sada-rece im- tko ima kesu, neka je uzme! Isto tako i torbu! Tko nema maca, neka proda svoj ogrtac pa ga kupi". Ovo su Isusove rijeci! Naravno, sad ce opet netko upitati zasto se Isus nije borio kad su dosli po njega rimski vojnici? Odgovor je jednostavan: Isus nije dosao na ovaj svijet boriti se, svrha njegova dolaska bila je datri svoj zivot! Zar zaista netko misli da su ga Rimljani ili Zidovi ubili? Ne, Bog je poslao Isusa da umre. Isus je dosao na svijet umrijeti, a ne braniti ili boriti se. Jos jednom naglasavam, u Svetom pismu nema ni jednog retka protiv rata. U svetom pismu potpuno jasno pise da postoje dva razloga za rat. Prvi razlog je obrana, a drugi razlog je osloboditi druge od ropstva bezboznih sotonskih diktatora, koji nemilosrdno kaznjavaju, iskoriscuju i ubijaju svoje vlastite ljude. To su stvari koje su se dogadale u proslosti i koje se danas dogadaju! Svijet bi se trebao zapitati:"sto bi se dogodilo ili gdje bi svijet danas bio da se Amerika nije umjesala u Drugi svjetski rat i borbu protiv nacizma? Gdje bi Amerika bila danas da se nije branila od nenadanog napada Japanaca, koji nisu prije toga najavili rat Americi?" Hrvati se trebaju zapitati sto bi se dogodilo i gdje bi Hrvtska danas bila da se nije odlucila braniti protiv vojno daleko jaceg neprijatelja? Da li bi danas imali toliko ocekivanu i konacno slobodnu Hrvatsku drzavu? Lako je sada, iz udobnih fotelja i topline i sigurnosti nasih domova govoriti sto se u Domovinskom ratu nije smjelo raditi., nije nam upoce tesko sjediti kod kuce u udobnim foteljama, raskosi i sigurnosti i govoriti sto se u Domovinskom ratu nije smjelo raditi.Mnogi su dali svoje zivote u ratu kako bi nama (u Americi i u Hrvatskoj) omogucili da budemo to sto jesmo i da imamo to sto imamo! Nije bilo drugog nacina. Sto kaze Isus No, vratimo se Isusovim rijecima (Evandelje po Luki 6, 27-31) "A vama koji me slusate kazem: Ljubite svoje neprijatelje! Cinite dobro onima koji vas mrze! Blagoslivljajte one koji vas proklinju! Molite za one koji vas ogovaraju! Udara li te tko po jednom obrazu, pruzaj mu i drugi! Tko ti uzima ogrtac, ne brani mu ni kosulje! Tko ti god iste, daji mu! A od onoga koji uzima tvoje ne trazi to nazad! Kako zelite da vama cine ljudi, tako cinite i vi njima!" No, Bog sigurno ne zeli da stradaju nevini ljudi koji ne razumiju istinu Bozje rijeci, koji ne razumiju Bozje naume, da cijela nacija bude zrtvovana za one koji su zli, koji zele dominirati u svemu, kontrolirati i unistiti cijelu naciju. Zar da se nista ne poduzima i da se dopusti da zlo uspije u svom sotonskom naumu? Apsolutno ne! Obaveza nacije je, kaze Bog, da se brani svim sredtsvima koja joj stoje na raspolaganju protiv onih koje je zele unistiti! Ako smo pozvani od strane drzavne vlasti da idemo u rat, po rijecima apostola Pavla, (u Rimljanima 13) nasa je obaveza i duznost kao pojedinca da se stavimo na raspolaganje drzavnim vlastima i da idemo u rat! Na kraju, u ovome mome clanku ja nisam iznio moje misljenje. Sve sto sam napisao o ratu i ratnim situacijama, Bog kaze u Svetom pismu. Moje je iskreno i duboko uvjerenje da bi mi ljudi trebali zivjeti po onome sto Bog kaze u Svetom pismu. Mi mozemo ignorirati Sveto pismo i ne vjerovati Bozjoj rijeci, koja nam nepokoljebljvom sigurnoscu stavlja istinu pred oci. Sve tvrdnje nevjernih ljudi to ne mogu pobiti pa makar se netko od njih i cvrsto drzao svojih stavova i misljenja. To nista ne mjenja na cinjenicama o kojima Sveto pismo ovdje govori! Mi mozemo ne vjerovati u Boga, nasega gospodina Isusa Krista, ali to ne znaci da On ne postoji!. (Svi citati preuzeti iz prijevoda Biblije u nakladi "Krscanske sadasnjosti)
|
»
(E) A hanging court that shackles innocent lives
|
International lawyers court injustice
Jerusalem Post International lawyers court injustice
By V.M. Raguz and Barbara Novosel
Mar. 27, 2003
The International Criminal Court (ICC) was inaugurated March 11th with the swearing in of its 18 judges. Israel does not recognize the ICC, and rightfully so.
In fact, given the latest developments in international criminal law and practice, all responsible states, even if they are signatories of the ICC, will follow the Israeli lead if found in similar situations.
The precedents at the precursor to the ICC, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the ICTY, will need to be substantially altered before international criminal law and courts can be viewed as credible institutions.
The majority of supporters of international tribunals are universal justice enthusiasts probably like the writers of this article a decade ago, when they were helping the Organization of Islamic Conference draft the first paper submitted to the United Nations on the establishment of the ICTY.
Enthusiasm often gives away to reality. Having closely followed the work of the ICTY or practiced before it, our enthusiasm has given way not only to reality, but also to deep disappointment.
The ICTY has established law and procedure, employed witnesses and evidence, and designed an appeals process of a type and in ways not seen in any national jurisdiction of the democratic world. Much of the blame lies not with the ICTY, but with its founder, the United Nations Security Council, that has refused to seriously review its work since its inception nine years ago.
The ICTY has thus operated in a vacuum, serving the interests of its prosecutors, disregarding the interests of universal justice.
The peoples in the Balkans have also been shortchanged, because the ICTY was to have been the primary vehicle for reconciliation. Because of its actions and decisions, the ICTY's credibility has been reduced to the lowest levels.
War criminals like Slobodan Milosevic and Vojislav Seselj now see it as a stage where they can become heroes, immortalized by large segments of their countrymen. Others, like fugitive Ante Gotovina, see it as a hanging court that shackles innocent lives.
Policy failures notwithstanding, the ICTY is actually weakest on the issues of substantive law it created. At its founding in May 1993, the ICTY officials and future judges were instructed by the UN secretary-general and members of the Security Council to carry out their duties within existing international law.
So much for a court taking cue from its legislature. The ICTY has created law that is practiced nowhere else.
For example, at the time the crimes in the Balkans were committed and the ICTY was founded, the standing law said that crimes against humanity involved attacks against civilian population that must be both systematic and widespread. The Hague prosecution insisted that "and" should be "or," so that in proving this serious charge it would need to prove only one element.
Moreover, the court refused to design a legal test on either notion. Thus, in an extreme case, this could result in someone being convicted of a crime against humanity if there was a plan to kill one civilian during an attack, or if a number of civilians were killed but no premeditated plan existed.
This drastic change in international criminal law was effected by changing a three-letter connector.
ONE MAY be surprised, but just about any action by the Israeli army that results in civilian deaths would qualify as a crime against humanity. Neither will this reality escape the NGOs and other international humanitarian law enthusiasts, who will pursue lawsuits against the premiers of the UK and Spain in particular for their leading roles in the intervention against Iraq.
The ICTY made it possible for anyone with superior status civilian or military to be convicted under command responsibility for any crime if he knew or had reason to know that a subordinate had committed crimes, or if he failed to take measures to prevent such acts, or punish the perpetrators.
For example, a civilian defendant's conviction of crimes against humanity in a particular area was based solely on an order from a military commander to take a village. The commander claimed in the order that the civilian leaders had been informed about "everything." The court found this sufficient proof that the defendant had necessary knowledge.
It is difficult to imagine a case where the ICTY would not find necessary knowledge. And it is almost certain that based on this precedent, the Belgian high court or any other could convict Ariel Sharon or any other senior Israeli official for crimes against humanity related to the Sabra and Shatilla massacres.
Another drastic development in the law on crimes against humanity is the ICTY's definition of "civilian population." It has adopted a wide definition, so if the target is predominantly civilian, the attack it not permissible, which in itself appears acceptable.
However, in practice, the ICTY has in effect ruled that if there is shelling coming from a 50-resident building because of the presence of a mortar and a 40-person armed unit, it cannot be attacked.
Similarly, if these 40 soldiers are alone in the building and they abandon arms, even unbeknownst to the attacker, they are considered civilian. One can just imagine the range of abuses in modern wars, such as the one on the streets of Israel, which such law promotes.
As to the procedure, it is an accepted fact now that there is no guarantee of speedy proceedings at the ICTY. Defendants wait for years to have their trials commence. The trials and appeals take a few more years.
One middle-ranking officer, Tihomir Blaskic, has been imprisoned over six years already, and his appeal is yet to begin. Once on trial the defendant is at a huge disadvantage, unless he is wealthy like Milosevic, since the ICTY allocates almost all of its funds to the prosecution.
Many trials have turned into secret proceedings, because key witnesses are often heard in camera. The oral testimonies are full of hearsay evidence, acceptable at the ICTY.
Another injustice to the rules of evidence used by today's democracies is the practice at the tribunal that allows newspaper articles, unsigned documents and copied documents as evidence. The obligation to provide exculpatory evidence seems not even to be a theoretical issue with the prosecutors.
Finally, there is the fundamental issue of the appeals process. Both the trial and appellate judges are judges of one institution, contrary to the practice in modern democracies, where the trial court is separate from the appeal instances. The trial judges regularly appear as appellate judges in closely related or effectively the same cases.
The ICC has crafted an improved appeals process. It has separate trial and appeal chambers, and the judges cannot serve in both. But this is just one small step in improving the international criminal law, and restoring its credibility. That credibility will be crucial for the Arab world in particular, when Saddam Hussein and his immediate subordinates are eventually tried there.
V.M. Raguz was ambassador of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the EU and NATO in 1998-2000. Barbara Novosel practiced before the Tribunal on the defense side for two years.
This article can also be read at http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/A/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1048678851540
|
|
|