CROWN - Croatian World Network - http://www.croatia.org/crown
(E) Jasenovac in the NY Times
http://www.croatia.org/crown/articles/7536/1/E-Jasenovac-in-the-NY-Times.html
By Nenad N. Bach
Published on 11/18/2001
 
This appeared in yesterday's NY Times. We should all congratulate Mr. 
 
Maras of the Croatian embassy for speaking up at the press conference. 
 
Also, note how this article desribes Jasenovac being set up by the 
 
"Republic of Croatia." It is also "one of the . . . most brutal camps" 
 
of WWII (one wonders how anyone can determine that). 
 
 
I think this article again points to what I have been urging: that the 
 
Croatian govt must obtain a PR firm to deal with these kinds of issues. 
 
This story, for ex., should have been "spinned" as how the bad Serbs 
 
stole items from Jasenovac and took them to Banja Luka. Moreover, I 
 
have read some estimates concerning the large number of ethnic Croat 
 
victims at the camp (among others, Vladko Macek was a prisoner there for 
 
some period of time). This was recognized in the press release of the 
 
US Holocaust Museum but not in this story. That is something that 
 
should have been emphasized as well and, again, a PR firm would have 
 
known how to have done that. 
 
 
Further, the most authoritative numbers that I read, compiled by Ivo 
 
Goldstein, show approx. 80,000 victims - here again, presumably for 
 
dramatic effect, Museum officials upped the number by 20,000, or 25%. 
 
Based on my past experience, we can argue till we're blue in the face 
 
that the number was overstated without convincing the newspapers. 
 
 
I also note the article states that 300,000 Serbs died throughout 
 
Croatia. This is inaccurate as this number also includes, I beleive, 
 
those who died in BH as well. Mr. Maras' points are well taken - this 
 
number includes combatants (i.e., Chetniks and Partisans). 
 
 
Moreover, as we all know, President Mesic was in Israel 2 weeks ago and 
 
as far as I am aware a story about his visit appeared in only one 
 
American paper, the LA Times, and in no Jewish-American publications (at 
 
least not yet). Presumably, a PR firm would have handled the story in 
 
such a manner to assure greater coverage of that event. 
 
 
I will share one point which caused me some concern during my meeting 
 
with President Mesic and Foreign Minister Picula. At least one member 
 
of the delegation did not beleive me when I said that the Croatian flag 
 
was consistently presented as a fascist/Ustashe flag in the US press. 
 
The argument was that if that were the case neither Israel nor the US 
 
would allow such a flag to be flown. 
 
 
This was a major point made by American and UK reporters during the war 
 
years. As we saw in the LA Times article, this continues to be a 
 
problem. The answer to this issue is very simple - the "sahovnica" coat 
 
of arms was also used by the Communists as part of the coat of arms of 
 
the SR Croatia. There's no way the Communists would have allowed a 
 
supposedly fascist symbol to be used. 
 
 
John Kraljic 
 
 
Documenting a Death Camp in Nazi Croatia 
 
By NEIL A. LEWIS 
 
WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 - Officials of the United States Holocaust Museum 
 
said today that they had discovered and preserved a cache of decaying 
 
documents and artifacts from one of the lesser-known but most brutal 
 
concentration camps of World War II. The camp, known as Jasenovac, was 
 
operated in Croatia by the Ustasha, the Nazi puppet government. 
 
The artifacts were found deteriorating in a building in Banja Luka in 
 
the Serbian part of Bosnia last year, officials said. 
 
Peter Black, the museum's chief historian, told reporters today that 
 
Jasenovac was crude in comparison to the industrialized Nazi 
 
extermination camps like Auschwitz. Mr. Black said there were no gas 
 
chambers or crematories, so prisoners were murdered one by one with 
 
axes, guns, knives or prolonged torture. Bodies were buried or thrown 
 
into the adjacent Sava River. 
 
Jasenovac (pronounced ya-SEN- oh-vatz), actually a complex of five camps 
 
about 60 miles from the Croatian capital, Zagreb, has been little 
 
studied in the West, but the history has long resonated in the modern 
 
Balkans, where analysts and historians have debated about how much of 
 
the region's violence may be traced to historic ethnic enmities. 
 
Mr. Black estimated that nearly 100,000 people had been killed in 
 
Jasenovac, the largest number being Serbs, followed by Jews and Gypsies. 
 
The camp was established by the Republic of Croatia to eliminate anyone 
 
who was not an ethnic Croatian. Mr. Black said a combination of factors, 
 
including the reluctance of officials to agree on what happened, had led 
 
to its history's remaining largely hidden from scholars until now. 
 
The collection includes 2,000 photographs, many of atrocities; tens of 
 
thousands of papers; and thousands of artifacts, like inmate crafts. 
 
Sara J. Bloomfield, director of the Holocaust Museum, said the project 
 
to save the documents and artifacts was especially significant because 
 
of the cooperation of the government of Croatia, whose history is cast 
 
in a poor light, as well as the governments of Serbia and Bosnia. Ms. 
 
Bloomfield said the governments had cooperated despite "the continuing 
 
sensitivity of all sides to this collection." 
 
That sensitivity was on display moments after the museum's presentation 
 
today when a diplomat from Croatia, Mate Maras, objected to the 
 
assertion by museum officials that more than 300,000 Serbs had died at 
 
the hands of the Ustasha throughout Croatia in World War II. 
 
Mr. Maras complained to Ms. Bloomfield and Mr. Black that the number was 
 
misleading because it included what he said were combatants throughout 
 
Croatia and thus was comparable to the hundreds of thousands of Croats 
 
killed in the war. 
 
Mr. Maras said that while he thought the assertions of the museum's 
 
personnel about Serb casualties were misleading, he agreed it was "a 
 
good day for Croatia to open up these sad pages of our history." 
 
Copies of the collection have been made and will be maintained at the 
 
Holocaust Museum and in Israel, officials said. The original collection 
 
will be returned to a museum in Croatia, where it will be put on display 
 
at the site of the Jasenovic complex, officials said. 
 
 
NOTICE: This e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, may contain legally 
 
privileged and/or confidential information. It is intended only for use by 
 
the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this 
 
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
 
copying of this e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, is strictly 
 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
 
immediately notify the sender by telephone and permanently delete this 
 
e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, and destroy any printout thereof. 
 
distributed by CROWN (Croatian World Net) - CroworldNet@aol.com 
  

(E) Jasenovac in the NY Times
This appeared in yesterday's NY Times. We should all congratulate Mr. 
 
Maras of the Croatian embassy for speaking up at the press conference. 
 
Also, note how this article desribes Jasenovac being set up by the 
 
"Republic of Croatia." It is also "one of the . . . most brutal camps" 
 
of WWII (one wonders how anyone can determine that). 
 
 
I think this article again points to what I have been urging: that the 
 
Croatian govt must obtain a PR firm to deal with these kinds of issues. 
 
This story, for ex., should have been "spinned" as how the bad Serbs 
 
stole items from Jasenovac and took them to Banja Luka. Moreover, I 
 
have read some estimates concerning the large number of ethnic Croat 
 
victims at the camp (among others, Vladko Macek was a prisoner there for 
 
some period of time). This was recognized in the press release of the 
 
US Holocaust Museum but not in this story. That is something that 
 
should have been emphasized as well and, again, a PR firm would have 
 
known how to have done that. 
 
 
Further, the most authoritative numbers that I read, compiled by Ivo 
 
Goldstein, show approx. 80,000 victims - here again, presumably for 
 
dramatic effect, Museum officials upped the number by 20,000, or 25%. 
 
Based on my past experience, we can argue till we're blue in the face 
 
that the number was overstated without convincing the newspapers. 
 
 
I also note the article states that 300,000 Serbs died throughout 
 
Croatia. This is inaccurate as this number also includes, I beleive, 
 
those who died in BH as well. Mr. Maras' points are well taken - this 
 
number includes combatants (i.e., Chetniks and Partisans). 
 
 
Moreover, as we all know, President Mesic was in Israel 2 weeks ago and 
 
as far as I am aware a story about his visit appeared in only one 
 
American paper, the LA Times, and in no Jewish-American publications (at 
 
least not yet). Presumably, a PR firm would have handled the story in 
 
such a manner to assure greater coverage of that event. 
 
 
I will share one point which caused me some concern during my meeting 
 
with President Mesic and Foreign Minister Picula. At least one member 
 
of the delegation did not beleive me when I said that the Croatian flag 
 
was consistently presented as a fascist/Ustashe flag in the US press. 
 
The argument was that if that were the case neither Israel nor the US 
 
would allow such a flag to be flown. 
 
 
This was a major point made by American and UK reporters during the war 
 
years. As we saw in the LA Times article, this continues to be a 
 
problem. The answer to this issue is very simple - the "sahovnica" coat 
 
of arms was also used by the Communists as part of the coat of arms of 
 
the SR Croatia. There's no way the Communists would have allowed a 
 
supposedly fascist symbol to be used. 
 
 
John Kraljic 
 
 
Documenting a Death Camp in Nazi Croatia 
 
By NEIL A. LEWIS 
 
WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 - Officials of the United States Holocaust Museum 
 
said today that they had discovered and preserved a cache of decaying 
 
documents and artifacts from one of the lesser-known but most brutal 
 
concentration camps of World War II. The camp, known as Jasenovac, was 
 
operated in Croatia by the Ustasha, the Nazi puppet government. 
 
The artifacts were found deteriorating in a building in Banja Luka in 
 
the Serbian part of Bosnia last year, officials said. 
 
Peter Black, the museum's chief historian, told reporters today that 
 
Jasenovac was crude in comparison to the industrialized Nazi 
 
extermination camps like Auschwitz. Mr. Black said there were no gas 
 
chambers or crematories, so prisoners were murdered one by one with 
 
axes, guns, knives or prolonged torture. Bodies were buried or thrown 
 
into the adjacent Sava River. 
 
Jasenovac (pronounced ya-SEN- oh-vatz), actually a complex of five camps 
 
about 60 miles from the Croatian capital, Zagreb, has been little 
 
studied in the West, but the history has long resonated in the modern 
 
Balkans, where analysts and historians have debated about how much of 
 
the region's violence may be traced to historic ethnic enmities. 
 
Mr. Black estimated that nearly 100,000 people had been killed in 
 
Jasenovac, the largest number being Serbs, followed by Jews and Gypsies. 
 
The camp was established by the Republic of Croatia to eliminate anyone 
 
who was not an ethnic Croatian. Mr. Black said a combination of factors, 
 
including the reluctance of officials to agree on what happened, had led 
 
to its history's remaining largely hidden from scholars until now. 
 
The collection includes 2,000 photographs, many of atrocities; tens of 
 
thousands of papers; and thousands of artifacts, like inmate crafts. 
 
Sara J. Bloomfield, director of the Holocaust Museum, said the project 
 
to save the documents and artifacts was especially significant because 
 
of the cooperation of the government of Croatia, whose history is cast 
 
in a poor light, as well as the governments of Serbia and Bosnia. Ms. 
 
Bloomfield said the governments had cooperated despite "the continuing 
 
sensitivity of all sides to this collection." 
 
That sensitivity was on display moments after the museum's presentation 
 
today when a diplomat from Croatia, Mate Maras, objected to the 
 
assertion by museum officials that more than 300,000 Serbs had died at 
 
the hands of the Ustasha throughout Croatia in World War II. 
 
Mr. Maras complained to Ms. Bloomfield and Mr. Black that the number was 
 
misleading because it included what he said were combatants throughout 
 
Croatia and thus was comparable to the hundreds of thousands of Croats 
 
killed in the war. 
 
Mr. Maras said that while he thought the assertions of the museum's 
 
personnel about Serb casualties were misleading, he agreed it was "a 
 
good day for Croatia to open up these sad pages of our history." 
 
Copies of the collection have been made and will be maintained at the 
 
Holocaust Museum and in Israel, officials said. The original collection 
 
will be returned to a museum in Croatia, where it will be put on display 
 
at the site of the Jasenovic complex, officials said. 
 
 
NOTICE: This e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, may contain legally 
 
privileged and/or confidential information. It is intended only for use by 
 
the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this 
 
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
 
copying of this e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, is strictly 
 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
 
immediately notify the sender by telephone and permanently delete this 
 
e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, and destroy any printout thereof. 
 
distributed by CROWN (Croatian World Net) - CroworldNet@aol.com